R5. Factors Which Influence Response to RiskR5.1 Having recognised that there is an element of risk inherent in virtually all activities, there was a general consensus that life would not be worth living, it would certainly be no fun, if we tried to avoid all risk. Indeed, it would be impossible to learn, develop and lead an active life in today's world without encountering numerous risks.
R5.2 With the exception of the younger and less able students who were unable to think on a conceptual basis, most recognised that people respond to risk in a number of different ways according to:
R5.3 Influence of Personality and Ability The older respondents were able to identify that people differ considerably in terms of the amount of risk they are prepared knowingly to take. That a spectrum exists from the risk-averse, very cautious person to the foolhardy individual who seems to be willing to take the most ridiculous risks and to enjoy doing so.
It was also clear during the groups, both through observation and through discussion with teachers, that the least able children were not yet able to think through fully the relationship between actions and their consequences, both for themselves and for other people. These children seemed most likely to embark on potentially dangerous activities and to push the boundaries of acceptable behaviour without thinking fully about the risks involved.
Equally whilst teachers, the older and more able children were able consciously to manage risk by taking safety measures on their own initiative, the least able tended to rely more on imposed rules and parental/teacher guidance and protection. R5.4 The Situation Again the older and more able children were able to recognise that one's response to risk can vary according to the situation at the time. Thus a normally cautious person may become preoccupied in one activity and forget to take their normal safety procedures for another, simultaneous activity.
Another example may be when peer pressure is so great it counters one's natural inclination or disinclination to do something.
R5.5 The Perceived Nature and Degree of Risk Involved The teachers and most students were also aware that people tend to respond to risk according to how great that risk is felt to be. This is a function of both the perceived likelihood of it occurring and what the worst outcome could be. Thus where the perceived likelihood of injury occurring was considered to be very low, the risk was more likely to be taken, and a 'won't happen to me' attitude may well be adopted. Equally if the risk of an injury occurring is relatively high but the injury itself is likely to be slight, the risk is also more likely to be taken.
The teachers and older students in particular acknowledged that perceptions of risk can be very inaccurate and can be biased by the individual's desire to do something.
R5.6 The End Benefit There was general recognition by all but the least able that where risk is known to exist, one unconsciously balances the perceived risks involved with the benefits of carrying out the action. Since some people derive more benefit from an activity than other people, some will be more willing to take risks than others. Hence some boys are happy to play rugby despite its known dangers, whilst others are not. Whilst some are eager to experience the exhilaration of skiing others who do not find the offered excitement so appealing consider the possibility of injury too off-putting.
|
||||||||